Table of Content
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest from our team delivered to your inbox
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Ready to get started?
Try It FreeData contracts are formalized agreements that define the relationship between data producers and consumers, specifying the structure, ownership, and expectations for data products. They serve a function analogous to APIs in software, providing a standardized way to ensure predictable and reliable data flows across teams and systems. With the increasing reliance on data-driven decision-making in analytics, data science, and engineering, data contracts have become indispensable for preventing disruptions and maintaining data quality.
Consider this common scenario: the analytics team assumes that revenue data in the warehouse is refreshed daily because their reports depend on up-to-date information. However, the team responsible for generating that data updates it only weekly. This disconnect can lead to erroneous analyses, missed opportunities, and operational headaches. Data contracts formalize such assumptions into explicit agreements, aligning all stakeholders on their roles, responsibilities, and expectations. This clarity is critical for avoiding chaos and ensuring that data consumers can rely on the data they use.
The shift to distributed data ownership has transformed data architectures, empowering domain-specific teams to own and manage the data they produce. This new approach highlights the need for explicit agreements between producers and consumers, which data contracts formalize. By implementing these agreements, organizations can enforce quality at the source, scale distributed architectures efficiently, and enable central teams to focus on building scalable validation frameworks.
Data contracts also foster collaboration, ensuring shared accountability and minimizing operational chaos as data flows through the organization.
ODCS (Open Data Contract Standard) is an open-source framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, that provides a standardized approach to defining data contracts. Originally developed by PayPal to support its Data Mesh initiatives, ODCS is now part of the Linux Foundation’s Bitol project.
ODCS offers a comprehensive framework for managing:
One of ODCS’s biggest advantages is its open standard, which prevents vendor lock-in and supports a wide array of tools. For example, while dbt’s model contracts are a step forward, they apply only to dbt models, leading to fragmented contract definitions across an organization. ODCS ensures consistency and adaptability, allowing organizations to build a unified data contract framework.
An example of a data contract, taken from ODCS GitHub:
Even the best-defined data contracts lose value if they are not enforced. Enforcement ensures contracts remain relevant, actionable, and trusted by both producers and consumers.
At Foundational, for instance, proactive enforcement analyzes pipeline code changes to identify potential violations early. By combining proactive validation with reactive monitoring, organizations can build a robust enforcement strategy that minimizes disruptions.
Implementing data contracts across an organization’s entire data landscape can feel overwhelming. To avoid analysis paralysis, start small:
This incremental approach allows teams to see the benefits of data contracts—reduced incidents, improved reliability, and smoother collaboration—without committing to a massive overhaul all at once.
Data contracts are the foundation for reliable, scalable, and collaborative data architectures in modern organizations. By adopting standards like ODCS, enforcing agreements proactively, and approaching implementation incrementally, companies can unlock the full potential of their data assets. With data contracts in place, organizations can achieve fewer disruptions, better collaboration between teams, and enhanced data quality, all while supporting the complexities of distributed ownership and modern data architectures.